Robotech 3000

  • Lobizon
  • Lobizon's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • REF Member
  • REF Member
  • Bounty Hunter! =☠=
  • Posts: 929
  • Thank you received: 4

Replied by Lobizon on topic Re:Robotech3000

MEMO1DOMINION wrote:

AND THAT MAYBE YOU GUYS MIGHT RECOGNIZE THEM IN WORKING WITH THIS FAN CLIP AS WELL.


Yep! www.blacksheepproductions.net/portfolios/blacksheep/troops/

but that work does not have anything to do with RT3k. :angry:
13 years 11 months ago #12349

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 4667
  • Thank you received: 114

Replied by MEMO1DOMINION on topic Re:Robotech3000

LOBI

but that work does not have anything to do with RT3k.

JUST A LITTLE TRIVIA THERE LOBI. I'M NOT SURE BUT I THINK THEY ALSO WENT TO WORK FOR LUCAS ON THE PREQUELS. WHO KNOWS. THEY MIGHT LINE UP FOR RLAM.
"IF IT DOESN'T EXIST...BUILD IT"
13 years 11 months ago #12351

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 105
  • Thank you received: 0

Replied by Troubleman245 on topic Re:Robotech3000

Those designs look pretty good and some look vey Macross 2 inspired. Image 16 looks reminicent of the VF-02 with fast pack when they lifted off from outside of the space cruiser.
13 years 11 months ago #12352

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 4667
  • Thank you received: 114

Replied by MEMO1DOMINION on topic Re:Robotech3000

YEAH, NOTICED THAT YESTERDAY AS I DOWNLOADED THE IMAGES.

ALL IN ALL GREAT ART. JUST BAD CG.


I GUESS DO TO IT'S TIME.
"IF IT DOESN'T EXIST...BUILD IT"
13 years 11 months ago #12356

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 105
  • Thank you received: 0

Replied by Troubleman245 on topic Re:Robotech3000

In the eric pic 7 it has a Valkyrie in a hanger bay with a caption that says that final Veritech design coming. So the Mac 2 Valks were there for convience or to give the artist a reference point. It looks like RT 3000 was going to include new Veritechs.
13 years 11 months ago #12357

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Lobizon
  • Lobizon's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • REF Member
  • REF Member
  • Bounty Hunter! =☠=
  • Posts: 929
  • Thank you received: 4

Replied by Lobizon on topic Re:Robotech3000

Troubleman245 wrote:

So the Mac 2 Valks were there for convience or to give the artist a reference point. It looks like RT 3000 was going to include new Veritechs.


Yep, you alraeady said.


" Design for veritec to come later just for scale. "


;)
13 years 11 months ago #12358

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • SIGHUP
  • SIGHUP's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Admin this!
  • Posts: 1056
  • Thank you received: 32

Replied by SIGHUP on topic Re:Robotech3000

The art is not too bad. I guess the CG was just in its infancy at the time. If it were to be done now, I wonder what the outcome would be?
--David Pena
SIGHUP
www.robotechx.com - a fandom based site | RIP Carl Macek (1951-2010)
13 years 11 months ago #12359

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 31
  • Thank you received: 0

Replied by integrase on topic Re:Robotech3000

T-850 Fembot.
13 years 11 months ago #12363

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 4667
  • Thank you received: 114

Replied by MEMO1DOMINION on topic Re:Robotech3000

ONLY CG I REMEMBER IN IT'S TIME WAS STARSHIP TROOPERS. WAS IT "ROUGHNECKS"?..


SINE THEN CG HAS IMPROVED. TO WHAT WE NOW KNOW OF TODAY MOVIES AND SERIES. ONE WELL KNOWN ONE WAS "REBOOT".
"IF IT DOESN'T EXIST...BUILD IT"
13 years 11 months ago #12365

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Lobizon
  • Lobizon's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • REF Member
  • REF Member
  • Bounty Hunter! =☠=
  • Posts: 929
  • Thank you received: 4

Replied by Lobizon on topic Re:Robotech3000

MEMO1DOMINION wrote:

ALL IN ALL GREAT ART. JUST BAD CG.

SIGHUP wrote:

The art is not too bad. I guess the CG was just in its infancy at the time.


Yep, 100 % agree with you guys, I got this image from The Art of ROBOTECH: The Shadow Chronicles book, that was a Robotech 3000 promo image.

13 years 11 months ago #12367

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.514 seconds